In the beginning, they just wanted a toy. Nowadays, you expect interaction, information, and innovation. People are a lot more Web savvy, and they know what they like.
Web author Richard Turner
As recently as a year or two ago many second-language teachers were in early
stages of Web anxiety. We wondered how we could connect to the Web and, once
there, what we could do with it. But as more of us start experimenting with the
Web, the sorts of questions we pose are shifting to Web pragmatics, questions
such as, How can we best profit from the Web as a supplementary resource? Or
more simply, Where in the Web does one turn to get great ideas and materials for
teaching? And more proactive, How can we utilize the Web's array of electronic
toys as a platform for online instruction?
Now the first question, where in the Web do you turn, is becoming easier to answer. As students and teachers we turn to Yahoo, AltaVista and other search engines for topic starters; we go to academic libraries, such as Harvard and Stanford, as well as to ERIC for document searches and summaries; and for teaching ideas, we can contact California TESOL, the University of Hull, the Annenberg/CPB Projects Online, TESOL, JALT, and so on.
The second question, how can we utilize the Web's toys, is what I want to sketch out here. I'm going to share my opinions, making a few base points that I have found valuable in my own Web-authoring, points so basic in fact that I keep coming back to them. I'm not going to get technical, and by no means do I want to imply that I can cover all the bases, but I hope what I suggest here makes sense to you, especially if you're involved or thinking of getting involved in Web-authoring yourself. Authoring on the Web is the buzz of the moment, because, as more teachers discover the educational potential of the Web, many are thinking of going one step further, plugging into the Web as a platform for classroom instruction.
In fact, the site you have accessed / are now reading, The Internet TESL Journal, is a good example of a transitional-proactive Web site and resource for initiating the authoring process. This site is "transitional" by offering practical tools like immediately-accessible, downloadable quizzes, a huge battery of lesson plans and links to other teacherly sites -- as well as fully-stocked archives of Web projects and other educational material. This site is also a "proactive" resource in that its archives contain a lot of advice on how to author and put up your own Web resources.
Other sites for more proactive information to help authors / teachers get started building Web pages include the so-called FUN Pages, the Academic Net, the Global School House, and the Ohio University CALL Lab. Examples of more customized resources for using Web technologies and constructing Web pages: the University of Sussex CALL Library, which offers text prompts for students and text editors for teachers, and La Trobe University's CELIA, a gopher resource which contains clearly written lesson plans for Web activities as well as language-teaching software for Mac and Wintel computers. In addition, there are numerous science-oriented sites especially designed or easily adapted for language learners, among which are an entire course centered on Web-applications provided by the Technical University of Berlin, "English for Engineering and Economics"; NASA's Learning Technologies Project -- to help teachers and students access scientific databases; the Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology's "Presentation Resources" -- guidelines for giving formal talks on botany and other subjects; Austin Community College's online "Technical Writing Textbook"; and Ohio University's "Introduction to Research and Research Writing".
Web-authoring is a newcomer to the teacher's toolkit, and, for me, after a
year or so of putting together a few sites and talking to colleagues about
scores of other sites on the Web, I see that Web-authoring introduces new levels
of responsibility and professional fulfillment. The most central question I keep
asking myself is, How can I construct Web sites to give students opportunities
for deeper processing of language? So, you see, I have an agenda. In other
words, I have a goal. This is the essential first step in authoring. And this is
my most important point: having goals.
A classroom Web site designed with deeper processing of language as one goal approaches the learning environment as an ecology available for re-invention and transformation into real communities of practice. This would be a flexible ecology in which the great divide between the emergent and the authorized is blurred. Classroom Web pages become combinations of media -- combinations through which students working solo and in collaboration take on more responsibility for data collection as well as language- and knowledge-acquisition. These are "nice words," I know, but staking a few theoretical claims to your authoring is another way to get rolling and stay relevant.
Here's what I mean by authoring media combinations for data collection and
knowledge-acquisition: Students at intermediate and advanced levels of English
-- in high school, college and professional settings -- can get very excited by
ideas they see as intriguing, essential or otherwise specific to their own
interests. We see an example of this, in native-speaker contexts, when the quiet
guy in the group suddenly pipes up with pitchers' stats when the talk comes
round to baseball. When we author a Web page to get students started on a topic
they care about -- following lines of fact-finding, image-collating, and
hypothesis-building -- we are engaging learners so they can pipe up, get more
involved.
Speaking of second-language teaching at the college level, in categorical
terms, among other strategies, I suggest gearing Web pages to students' academic
and other specific orientations as one way to begin. (In the language teaching
field, we often refer to this strategy as English for Academic Purposes -- EAP
-- and English for Specific Purposes -- ESP.) There's a good chance that a Web
site for history majors, for example, featuring a mix of dateline quizzes,
pop-up menus with bios and visuals of historical figures, links to
student-authored opinions about famous events from the past -- this mix of
specified interactivity will be more attractive than a generic language
approach. (For a good set of links for teaching history and other social
sciences, by the way, visit Georgetown University's Teaching with Information
Technologies site.) Similarly, a business-oriented strategy can be applied
to Web pages for college business majors. Case studies in successful commercial
ventures can be authored or gathered by the teacher or teachers working
together, and these texts and other items can be brought together as the core of
a Web site devoted to deploy business subject matter for second-language
learners. Examples of ancillary items include links to more texts (such as
background on a particular case), audio/video files to dramatize the role of
business conferences, supplementary language-oriented files, and so on. To get
started on specific-purpose projects such as these, you might consider checking
out the new ESP site
housed at the University of Aizu, Japan.
In my own Web pages for doctors-in-training, case studies I authored have prompted scores of texts by learners in response to questions and contextualized problems contained in the cases. Now -- with over a hundred student-written texts that are online as part of the original medical case study Web site -- this combination of student and original texts exemplifies the blurring of authorized and emergent sources of information.
One benefit of the current popularity of integrating Web technologies with
language instruction is that the Web entices all of us -- teachers and students
-- to get into this information and opinion business, affording emergent
language learners -- and their teachers -- interactive opportunities to respond
to so-called authorized information, the chance to appropriate, emend, debate
and extend sources of knowledge first published outside the classroom. And in
the process, of course, students can become authors and "authorize"
themselves.
I mentioned teachers working together, and this is an enormously important dimension of educational use of the Web. Hyperforums are proliferating, evolving from basic list-services, such as online teaching-oriented lists connected with language teaching associations like TESOL, JALT, etc., to more specialized or narrow-casted tankless think-tanks. The advantage of two, three or many more teachers conversing online is that they can help one another to organize and reorganize general principles of common interest. Another advantage is that they can work toward building consensual approaches to teaching practices; and, also, if their collaborative work takes on a public dimension -- a group Web site, reporting findings in cross-postings on other list services, etc. -- the Web can be a vehicle to help them reach out for new voices and new stake holders in their collaborative process.
Here's a final question to those of us who have a Web presence (whether a homepage, a teaching Web site, or something else): Why settle for being just a sub-set of our school's Web site -- for example, tucked away in a corner of the English department? I have designed two of my teaching resources, one in medicine, the other in science writing, so that they naturally belong within the ESL Loop -- a loose aggregation of applied linguistic sites worldwide. Another of my Web sites, on American verse, is connected to the Poetry Webring, a loop of sites concentrated on verse-related media. In other words, in addition to putting up effective documents and other resources for helping our students learn a second language, when we connect our sites to allied resources on the Web, teachers can extend the effectiveness of our Web sites by proposing their wider use and, by inference, inviting collaboration with colleagues.
In sum, 5 points: I am suggesting that fruitful Web-authoring entails: